Switch to/Cambie a:
Download Newsletters/Boletínes
English:
Newsletter 89
Newsletter 88
Newsletter 87
Newsletter 86
Newsletter 85
Newsletter 84
Newsletter 83
Newsletter 82
Newsletter 81
Newsletter 80
Newsletter 79
Newsletter 78
Newsletter 77
Newsletter 76
Newsletter 75
Newsletter 74
Newsletter 73
Newsletter 72
Newsletter 71
Newsletter 70
Newsletter 69
Newsletter 68
Newsletter 67
Newsletter 66
Newsletter 65
Newsletter 64
Newsletter 63
Newsletter 62
Newsletter 61
Newsletter 60
Newsletter 59
Newsletter 58
Newsletter 57
Newsletter 56
Español:
Boletín 89
Boletín 88
Boletín 87
Boletín 86
Boletín 85
Boletín 84
Boletín 83
Boletín 82
Boletín 81
Boletín 80
Boletín 79
Boletín 78
Boletín 77
Boletín 76
Boletín 75
Boletín 74
Boletín 73
Boletín 72
Boletín 71
Boletín 70
Boletín 69
Boletín 68
Boletín 67
Boletín 66
Boletín 65
Boletín 64
Boletín 63
Boletín 62
Boletín 61
Boletín 60
Boletín 59
Boletín 58
Boletín 57
Boletín 56Call/Llamada David Zapp
(917) 414-4651Search Articles/Busque Artículos
Recibe Los Artículos por Correo Electrónico
Receive Articles by E-mail
Subscribe to English Articles
Suscríbase a Artículos en Español
Recent Comments/Comentarios Recientes
- David S. Zapp on New York Federal Prosecutors Do Not Recommend Sentences
- David S. Zapp on Question from a lawyer
- David S. Zapp on Q and A
- David S. Zapp on El partido republicano de los Estados Unidos cambia para adoptar una actitud menos rigurosa sobre las condenas
- David S. Zapp on El Ministro de Justicia respalda una propuesta para reducir las condenas por drogas
-
Recent Articles/Artículos Recientes
Submit a Question/Envíe su pregunta
Categories/Categorías
Archives/Archivos
- July 2021
- February 2021
- September 2020
- August 2020
- May 2020
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- January 2019
- June 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- March 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- December 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- March 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- April 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Monthly Archives/Archivos por Mes: August 2019
El Tribunal de Apelaciones sostiene que las renuncias al derecho de apelación en los convenios declaratorios deben beneficiar al acusado y no solamente al Ministerio Público
Artículo original escrito el 13 de diciembre de 2018 por Danielle Quinn y Harry Sandick
Editado y abreviado por Johanna Zapp
En la causa del Ministerio Público contra Lutchman [United States v. Lutchman], el Tribunal de Apelaciones [del Segundo Circuito] concluyó que la renuncia del acusado a su derecho de apelación en el convenio para su […]
Posted in Artículos
Comments Off on El Tribunal de Apelaciones sostiene que las renuncias al derecho de apelación en los convenios declaratorios deben beneficiar al acusado y no solamente al Ministerio Público
Appeals Court Holds Appeal Waivers in Plea Agreements Must Benefit the Defendant and not Just the Government
Original article written byDanielle Quinn and Harry Sandick
Edited and abbreviated by Johanna Zapp
by Harry Sandick and Danielle C. Quinn on December 13, 2018
In United States v. Lutchman, the Court concluded that the defendant’s appellate waiver in his plea agreement was not valid (in that, for what he was giving up by waiving his right to appeal, he was not given […]
Posted in Articles
Comments Off on Appeals Court Holds Appeal Waivers in Plea Agreements Must Benefit the Defendant and not Just the Government
Second Circuit Rejects Sentence Based on Government’s Dramatic Shift From its Pre-Plea Pimentel Estimate
byMichael D. Schwartz and Harry Sandick on April 24, 2019
In United States v. Walker, 17-1896-cr (April 4, 2019), the Second Circuit held that the Government breached its plea agreement with the defendant by advocating for a term of imprisonment that was substantially higher than the Government’s initial sentencing estimate in the plea agreement. The decision addresses […]
Posted in Articles
Comments Off on Second Circuit Rejects Sentence Based on Government’s Dramatic Shift From its Pre-Plea Pimentel Estimate
El Segundo Circuito rechaza una condena basada en un cambio dramático en el cálculo Pimentel del Gobierno desde el convenio
Por Michael D. Schwartz and Harry Sandickel 24 de abril de 2019
En la causa United States v. Walker, 17-1896-cr (4 de abril de 2019), el tribunal de apelaciones del Segundo Circuito sostuvo que el Gobierno violó su convenio declaratorio con el acusado al requerir que se le impusiera un período de encarcelamiento sustancialmente mayor del […]
Posted in Artículos
Comments Off on El Segundo Circuito rechaza una condena basada en un cambio dramático en el cálculo Pimentel del Gobierno desde el convenio